{"id":161,"date":"2015-07-16T14:25:39","date_gmt":"2015-07-16T21:25:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/?p=161"},"modified":"2016-10-02T00:36:42","modified_gmt":"2016-10-02T07:36:42","slug":"re-thinking-life-death-and-purpose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/2015\/07\/16\/re-thinking-life-death-and-purpose\/","title":{"rendered":"Re-thinking life, death, and purpose"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kvoa.com\/story\/29195353\/university-mourns-professor-killed-on-bicycle\">death of my friend, Rafe Sagarin<\/a>, I&#8217;m re-thinking the nature of life, death, and one&#8217;s purposes and values while on this planet.\u00a0 Below are a few articles that I want to read and then discuss.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/06\/24\/opinion\/global\/24iht-june24-ihtmag-ricard-30.html\">Matthieu Ricard in the New York Times (2011) <\/a>regarding &#8220;The Future Doesn&#8217;t Hurt. Yet&#8221;\n<ul>\n<li>References a book written with his father &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/title\/monk-and-the-philosopher-a-father-and-son-discuss-the-meaning-of-life\">The Monk and the Philosopher<\/a>&#8221;\n<ul>\n<li>From an Amazon comment, the Monk sums up with:<\/li>\n<li>`&#8230;such a dialogue is useful, but can never be a substitute for the silence of personal experience, as Goethe had aptly stated, &#8220;silence allows nature to whisper to us&#8221;.&#8217;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.brainpickings.org\/2015\/05\/26\/the-monk-and-the-philosopher-1\/\">Review by Maria Popova<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;When Revel takes issue with the <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Buddhist concept of reincarnation<\/span>, pointing out its mystical and scientifically ungrounded suppositions, Ricard emphasizes its metaphorical and philosophical importance over its literal interpretation. Embedded in that notion, he suggests, is the key to unmooring ourselves from the tyranny of the self in the here and now:&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>From the book: &#8220;It\u2019s important to understand that what\u2019s called <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">reincarnation in Buddhism has nothing to do with the transmigration of some \u201centity\u201d<\/span> or other\u2026 As long as one thinks in terms of entities rather than function and continuity, it\u2019s impossible to understand the Buddhist concept of rebirth.\n<p>[\u2026]<\/p>\n<p>Since Buddhism denies the existence of any individual self that could be seen as a separate entity capable of transmigrating from one existence to another by passing from one body to another, <strong>one might well wonder what it could be that links those successive states of existence together\u2026 It\u2019s seen as a continuum, <span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">a stream of consciousness<\/span> that continues to flow without there being any fixed or autonomous entity running through it.<\/strong>&#8220;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The fact that there\u2019s no such discontinuous entity being transferred from one life to the next doesn\u2019t mean that there can\u2019t be a continuity of functioning. That the self has no true existence doesn\u2019t prevent one particular stream of consciousness from having qualities that distinguish it from another stream. The fact that there\u2019s no boat floating down the river doesn\u2019t prevent the water from being full of mud, polluted by a paper factory, or clean and clear. The state of the river at any given moment is the result of its history. In the same way, an individual stream of consciousness is loaded with all the traces left on it by positive and negative thoughts, as well as by actions and words arising from those thoughts. What we\u2019re trying to do by spiritual practice is to gradually purify the river.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;There\u2019s a natural feeling of self, of \u201cI,\u201d which makes you think \u201cI\u2019m cold, I\u2019m hungry, I\u2019m walking,\u201d and so forth. By itself, that feeling is neutral. It doesn\u2019t specifically lead to either happiness or suffering. But then comes the idea that the self is a kind of constant that lasts all your life, regardless of all the physical and mental changes you go through. You get attached to the idea of being a self, \u201cmyself,\u201d a \u201cperson,\u201d and of \u201cmy\u201d body, \u201cmy\u201d name, \u201cmy\u201d mind, and so on. Buddhism accepts that there is a continuum of consciousness, but denies any existence of a solid, permanent, and autonomous self anywhere in that continuum. The essence of Buddhist practice is therefore to get rid of that illusion of a self which so falsifies our view of the world.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Founded\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/karuna-shechen.org\/\">Karuna-Shechen Foundation<\/a> doing humanitarian work in Tibet, Nepal, etc.<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The unbridled consumerism of our planet\u2019s richest 5 percent is the greatest contributor to the climate change that will bring the greatest suffering to the most destitute 25 percent, who will face the worst consequences.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Unchecked consumerism operates on the premise that others are only instruments to be used and that the environment is a commodity. This attitude fosters unhappiness, selfishness and contempt upon other living beings and upon our environment. People are rarely motivated to change on behalf of something for their future and that of the next generation. They imagine, \u201cWell, we\u2019ll deal with that when it comes.\u201d They resist the idea of giving up what they enjoy just for the sake of avoiding disastrous long-term effects. <strong>The future doesn\u2019t hurt \u2014 yet.<\/strong>&#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/li>\n<li>Interdependence, sentient living beings, suffering<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;all beings are interrelated and all, without exception, want to avoid suffering and achieve happiness&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Harkening back to one of my childhood&#8217;s most trusted sources &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/what-happens-to-consciousness-when-we-die\">Scientific American on &#8220;What Happens to Consciousness When We Die&#8221;<\/a>\u00a0(2012). \u00a0I&#8217;m not intrigued by the rather dull article, but inspired by the title and many of the comments!\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;&#8230;the goal of enlightenment is to transcend to a more universal nonlocal, nonmaterial identity.&#8221; &#8212;\u00a0Deepak Chopra?<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The hypothesis that the brain creates consciousness, however, has vastly more evidence for it than the hypothesis that consciousness creates the brain.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Thousands of experiments confirm the hypothesis that neurochemical processes produce subjective experiences.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;2008 paper published in <i>Mind and Matter<\/i> by University of California, Irvine, cognitive scientist Donald D. Hoffman: Conscious Realism and the Mind-Body Problem. Conscious realism asserts that the objective world, i.e., the world whose existence does not depend on the perceptions of a particular observer, consists entirely of conscious agents.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;In Hoffman&#8217;s view, our senses operate to construct reality, not to reconstruct it.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/markmanson.net\/life-purpose\">Seven strange questions that help you find your life purpose<\/a>&#8221; by Mark Manson<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After the death of my friend, Rafe Sagarin, I&#8217;m re-thinking the nature of life, death, and one&#8217;s purposes and values while on this planet.\u00a0 Below are a few articles that I want to read and then discuss. Matthieu Ricard in &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/2015\/07\/16\/re-thinking-life-death-and-purpose\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[27,26,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-death","category-life","category-values-purpose"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8qtAj-2B","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":222,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161\/revisions\/222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}