{"id":60,"date":"2009-02-17T01:17:14","date_gmt":"2009-02-17T08:17:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/?p=60"},"modified":"2009-02-17T01:17:14","modified_gmt":"2009-02-17T08:17:14","slug":"compact-fluorescents75-power-savings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/2009\/02\/17\/compact-fluorescents75-power-savings\/","title":{"rendered":"Compact fluorescents:75% power savings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Brightened up the playroom and kitchen a bit today by replacing ~500W of incandescent bulbs in recessed ceiling fixtures with 7x23W (=~175W) CFs from Home Depot (about $4 each).\u00c2\u00a0 The &#8220;green&#8221; n:Vision bulbs have a pleasant, warm glow to them (the &#8220;blue&#8221; and &#8220;red&#8221; really would work only in the garage) and Annie agreed the situation was improved.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s a power reduction of about 70% for those two rooms.\u00c2\u00a0 For an optional source of additional brightness, I retrofitted a broken halogen torchiere lamp to take 2x25W CFs (equivalent light output to 150W incandescent).\u00c2\u00a0 Since the kitchen already had about ~150W of CFs lighting, that brings the total lighting demand for those most-used rooms in our home to 325-375W.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brightened up the playroom and kitchen a bit today by replacing ~500W of incandescent bulbs in recessed ceiling fixtures with 7x23W (=~175W) CFs from Home Depot (about $4 each).\u00c2\u00a0 The &#8220;green&#8221; n:Vision bulbs have a pleasant, warm glow to them &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/2009\/02\/17\/compact-fluorescents75-power-savings\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[14],"tags":[18],"class_list":["post-60","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ecohome","tag-compact-fluorescent"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8qtAj-Y","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60\/revisions\/61"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/econscience.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}